Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Prudential's AIA deal hits shareholder glitch

Reuters        LONDON    Tue Apr 27, 2010 8:25am EDT

Mon, Apr 26 2010LONDON (Reuters) - Prudential is facing the makings of a shareholder revolt over its $35.5 billion deal to buy AIA, raising the prospect the deal could fail and adding to pressure for a breakup of the British insurer instead.

Prudential's bid for AIA -- the Asia arm of American International Group -- has been masterminded by Chief Executive Tidjane Thiam and would be partly financed with a massive $21 billion share sale.

Newspaper reports on Tuesday said Prudential's largest shareholder, Capital Research & Management, has reservations about the deal and would prefer a break-up of Prudential. One other top-10 investor also said the deal might struggle to get the required shareholder approval for the rights issue.

"There is a very good chance they won't get the 75 percent needed -- in which case the management would be in a very difficult position; effectively a vote of no-confidence in the strategy of the company," the top-10 shareholder told Reuters.

"There is merit in the argument that more value might be realized if Pru was broken up. We have encouraged Pru to sell UK business and focus on the Asian business -- it's an argument certainly worth exploring," that shareholder said.

Capital declined to comment when approached by Reuters.

The Times newspaper reported that Capital is orchestrating a potential break-up of Prudential, of which it owns 12 percent.

Broker Olivetree Securities said typically only 60 percent of shareholders attend big contentious EGMs. "Given Capital currently own 12 percent of the share capital of Prudential -- if only 60 percent of the shareholder base attends, Capital's voting power would be 20 percent -- with 25 percent needed to block the transaction," Olivetree said in a note.

It has lined-up Clive Cowdery's acquisition vehicle, Resolution, British insurer Aviva and a third, unnamed party to buy chunks of Prudential, the newspaper said.

Aviva and Resolution declined to comment. Prudential said its meetings with shareholders had been "constructive" and the next step is to publish the prospectus for its rights issue, which is expected on May 5.

"Prudential needs to really get out and sell this deal on its merits once the prospectus comes out," said an industry executive. "Fund managers need to see the prospectus. It is hard to make a compelling view until they have all the data."

The news boosted Prudential's shares, by 1 percent to 551.1 pence by 1217 GMT, as markets upped their bets that the dilutive rights issue was less likely to happen. The European insurance index fell 1.8 percent.

Prudential's cash call is fully underwritten by Credit Suisse, HSBC and JP Morgan Cazenove.

HIGH STAKES

Capital's reported stance against the deal is likely to sway other large investors, many of whom had fretted over the size of the rights issue, the price that Prudential is paying and the integration risks of the mammoth takeover.

"To hear that Capital is not supportive of the deal will stir this up a lot more," the top-10 shareholder said.

Prudential's bid for AIA was a huge shot in the arm for AIG, which received a $182.3 billion taxpayer-funded rescue after its near collapse in September 2008. A collapse of the deal would also be a setback for the U.S. government.

Newspaper reports have speculated Los Angeles-based Capital could be leant on by the U.S. government to back the deal, with which AIG hopes to pay back some of the money it owes.

"The U.S. government could have brought pressure to bear on Capital in private, but can't be seen doing that now the fund's position has leaked," one UK broker said.

An investment banker not involved in the deal said fears the rights issue might flounder were overdone.

"Shareholders always ask for their pound of flesh. The deal is expensive given where Pru is trading but it is underwritten by the company's banks. Worst case scenario the banks end up with a stake in Prudential, but I don't think it will come to that," the banker said.

Capital Research and Management holds an about 12 percent stake. Its holding has grown from just over 10 percent in December last year.

The World's Leading Companies

Forbes.com    By DeCarlo Scott, Updated: 4/21/2010

The Forbes Global 2000 are the biggest, most powerful listed companies in the world. These global giants usually reorder themselves at a glacial pace, but sometimes--as with the volatile financial sector of late--with more abruptness.

Extreme vagaries of business or poor performance can take them off the list entirely. In any case, our composite ranking is the best snapshot of just how these titans compare. As we show, the corporate dominance of the developed nations is steadily receding. With respect not just to size but to what investors care most about, see our Global High Performers, an elite list of companies that set the pace in their respective industries.

Forbes' ranking of the world's biggest companies departs from lopsided lists based on a single metric, like sales. Instead we use an equal weighting of sales, profits, assets and market value to rank companies according to size. This year's list reveals the dynamism of global business. The rankings span 62 countries, with the U.S. (515 members) and Japan (210 members) still dominating the list, but with a combined 33 fewer entries.

This year, the following countries gained the most ground: mainland China (113 members), India (56 members) and Canada (62 members). Even Oman and Lebanon are now Global 2000 members. Also gaining a significant presence on our list this year are corporations from Ireland, South Africa and Sweden.

In total the Global 2000 companies now account for $30 trillion in revenues, $1.4 trillion in profits, $124 trillion in assets and $31 trillion in market value. All metrics are down from last year, except for market value, which rose 61%.

An analysis of the Global 2000 shows that despite the turmoil in the financial sector, banks still dominate, with 308 companies in the 2000 lineup, thanks in large measure to their asset totals. The oil and gas industry, with 115 companies, scores high in sales, profits and stock-market value, yet these sectors were not the leaders in growth over the past year. Insurance companies (up 27%) led all sectors in sales growth, while the leaders in profit growth were drugs and biotech firms (up 20%).

Our full list is rich with industry leaders who are making strategic moves to help navigate through these tough economic times. Among them you will find Taiwan's Acer, aiming to become the biggest seller of laptops and netbooks by 2011, and Danish biotech Novozymes, finding new uses for enzymes.

For the past few years we have also identified an important subset of the Global 2000: big companies that also have exceptional growth rates. To qualify as a Global High Performer, a company must stand out from its industry peers in growth, return to investors and future prospects. Most of the 130 Global High Performers have been expanding their earnings at 28% a year and 20% annualized gains to shareholders over the past five years.

Both Acer and Novozymes are on our Global High Performers list, and 77 of the 130 companies on this select list have headquarters outside the U.S. Our list includes global brand names, such as Belgium's Anheuser-Busch Inbev, H&M (Sweden) and Honda Motor(Japan), as well as foreign companies with lower profiles, such as Australian drug company CSL.

Among notable U.S. Global High Performers are Apple, Google, McDonald's and Nike.

To find these global superstars, we analyzed 26 industries of the Global 2000 (we excluded trading companies) and gave each company respective scores for long-term and short-term sales and profit growth; return on capital; debt-to-capital (the lower the better); and total return over five years. Other requirements for the global high performers list: shares traded in the U.S. or Depositary Receipts, positive equity and sales of at least $1 billion.

Alonso’s thumbs insured for £10mil

The Star Malaysia    Tuesday April 27, 2010

LONDON: Double world champion Fernando Alonso gave a £10mil (US$13.33mil) thumbs-up to future Formula One success with Ferrari yesterday.

Team sponsors Santander said they had insured the Spaniard's thumbs for 5mil each as part of a publicity campaign for accident and life insurance ahead of next week's Spanish Grand Prix in Barcelona.

"Alonso's thumbs are a symbol, as well as being essential for driving a Formula One car, in that they make a sign of victory and show that everything is under control and well protected," the bank said in a statement.

Alonso, who joined Ferrari this season after winning championships with Renault, told a news conference in Madrid that he hoped the first European race of the season would reinforce his title challenge.

The Spaniard, winner of the Bahrain season-opener, is third overall after four races.

"The time has come to show who is up for winning the championship and who is not. Now in Europe the moment of truth has arrived for drivers and teams who are going to show who is able to develop quickest," said Alonso.

"A nice fight is starting," he added.

Alonso said he was not worried about his Ferrari engine after suffering a failure in Friday practice at the last race in China.

"I'm sure we will have a great car in Barcelona and I am not worried," he added. "The Ferrari mechanics are very confident that they have resolved the problems and I hope the fans have a fantastic time and there is a great atmosphere as ever." — Reuters

AirAsia unit gets nod for Labuan captive insurance biz

Written by The Edge Financial Daily Tuesday, 27 April 2010 19:31

KUALA LUMPUR: AIRASIA BHD 's unit AirAsia Corporate Services has received official approval to set up a Labuan captive insurance business.

The low-cost carrier said on Tuesday, April 27 the unit had received the go-ahead from Labuan Financial Services Authority to set up the captive insurance business.

"The primary purpose of establishing the Labuan captive insurance business is to provide access for the company to commercial insurance markets and provide flexibility in managing and retaining its own risks," it said.

AirAsia said this will have a choice of which risks and how much risk the company intends to retain within the group thus simultaneously giving the company greater flexibility in managing its risks.

PacificMas gets nod to start talks on unit sale

The Star Malaysia    Thursday April 22, 2010

PETALING JAYA: Bank Negara has given its nod to PacificMas Bhd to start talks with the Great Eastern group on the disposal of the former's wholly-owned subsidiary The Pacific Insurance Bhd.

PacificMas told the stock exchange yesterday that Bank Negara had, via its letter dated April 21, said it had no objection in principle for the preliminary negotiations to commence for the disposal of The Pacific Insurance.

Both PacificMas and Great Eastern group would be required to obtain prior approval of the Finance Minister, with the recommendation of the central bank, before entering into any agreement to effect the above disposal, PacificMas said.

Singapore's Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp Ltd (OCBC) is the ultimate holding company of PacificMas and Great Eastern group.

Ever since OCBC announced a conditional takeover of shares it did not already own in listed subsidiary PacificMas in 2008, resulting in it holding a higher stake, talk has been swirling of the impending sale.

It is understood that Bank Negara has said OCBC cannot own two insurance companies in Malaysia, i.e. Great Eastern and PacificMas, which means the banking group has to sell PacificMas' insurance business or merge the insurers.

Previous talks with OSK Holdings Bhd, ACE Synergy Insurance Bhd, Usaha Tegas Sdn Bhd and EON Bank Bhd for the insurance unit failed due to no agreement on pricing.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

UK's Prudential names Devey to lead Asia integration

Wed, Apr 14, 2010    Reuters

LONDON - Britain's Prudential has appointed Rob Devey, currently head of UK and Europe, to lead the integration of its Asian operations and the Asian arm of rival AIG, after the sector's biggest acquisition.

Prudential announced last month that it planned to buy American International Assurance (AIA) for $35.5 billion (S$49.5b) in a record-breaking takeover, scuppering a planned listing. It still needs to complete a $21 billion (S$29b) rights issue to fund the deal.

Devey, who joined Britain's largest insurer in 2009, will report directly to Chief Executive Tidjane Thiam and takes up the role with immediate effect, the company said on Wednesday.

A former HBOS banker and managing director at Lloyds Banking Group, Devey was involved in integrating the retail banking operations of Halifax and Bank of Scotland and divisions of HBOS and Lloyds, after a tie-up at the height of the crisis that created Britain's largest retail bank.

His challenge this time will be to combine the two largest foreign players in Asia, with both often operating in the same countries but with different products and different customers. Difficulties will include dealing with regulatory hurdles and overcoming unease among AIA staff over the deal.

Several analysts have said integration would be an "uphill battle", not least because it is the sale of AIA by AIG to an archrival to repay the parent company's loans.

Two senior AIA executives resigned last month and speculation is rife over who will lead the combined group in Asia. Pru's Asian boss Barry Stowe is currently a front runner, but could be replaced by AIA boss Mark Wilson.

Devey will continue to be responsible for Prudential UK and Europe but Andrew Crossley, managing director finance, and Barry O'Dwyer, managing director for retail life and pensions, will provide back up, becoming deputy chief executives at the unit.

Analysts said Devey - likely to be backed by Stowe - was unlikely to return to his previous full-time position after an integration project which could take around two years.

They said the move by a key UK manager illustrated Pru's refocusing of its operations away from its domestic market.

"This move also highlights the increased importance of Asia to the group compared to the UK and may increase speculation that ultimately the UK is non-core and may be disposed or de-merged," analysts at Oriel Securities said.

"We would not expect such a decision to be taken in the short term as the UK still generates significant part of the cashflow of the group and effectively funds much of the dividend."

Shares in Britain's largest insurer were up 0.5 percent at 574.5p (S$12.30) at around 0800 GMT, above a broadly flat European insurance sector but in line with the FTSE index.

AXA Affin Life focused on building solid foundation

The Star Malaysia    Monday April 19, 2010    By DALJIT DHESI

PETALING JAYA: AXA Affin Life Insurance Bhd, a relatively new entrant in the insurance market, may venture into the lucrative takaful business in the next two years.

Chief executive officer Loke Kah Meng said for now, the company wanted to build a solid foundation for its conventional insurance and distribution channels first before considering going into Islamic insurance.

"At the moment, we want to focus on conventional business and grow our traditional life, investment-linked business and medical insurance as well as strengthen our multi-distribution channels.

"There is potential in the takaful market as currently the penetration rate is below 10% compared with over 40% in life insurance," he said during an interview.

Nonetheless, he said the life insurance penetration rate was still not that high compared with Singapore and Hong Kong and there was ample room for the life business to grow in view of the Government's New Economic Model which, among others, stressed on high per capita income and business sustainability.

AXA Affin Life, which started operations about three years ago, is a 51:49 joint venture between Affin Holdings Bhd and AXA Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd.

For the company to grow, Loke said it would need to go "back to basics" as it realised consumers were confident with companies with financial strength, market leadership and which they could trust.

As part of the AXA group, the company could share the best practices from around the world and apply them in the Malaysian market. This includes the areas of distribution, marketing, operations, products and human resource.

AXA currently has 80 million customers worldwide and manages more than one trillion euros globally. It is among the few awarded double A ratings by Standard & Poor's despite the global financial turmoil.

Loke said one way AXA Affin Life could boost market share and overall business standing in Malaysia was by banking on AXA's regional blueprint or operating model, a standardised blueprint used in the eight Asian countries which AXA has presence in.

He said this common platform would provide an avenue for quick product sharing knowledge and implementation as well as faster time for product launches and sales.

Apart from improved operations efficiency and costs, the blueprint would also enhance the ability to attract and retain talent within the group in the region.

Multi-distribution channels would be another way to enable AXA Affin Life to boost its presence in the country. Bancassurance and agency are the main distribution channels apart from direct marketing.

Loke said currently five local and foreign banks were its bancassurance partners to distribute its products. All five were strong in wealth management and consumer banking, which Loke said was a boon to the company's distribution of its products.

AXA Affin Life currently has a market share of 1.5%, the smallest among the 16 life insurers in the country.

Loke said he anticipated the company to move up "two or three notches" by the second quarter of this year.

To expand its agency force, Loke said it would look at successful agents seeking to manage their own agency or those experienced in the sale of other financial products but now looking to become life agents. The company has 400 agents and plans to expand the number to 1,200 by year-end, and 3,000 by 2012.

AXA Affin Life also aims to double its new business premiums to RM320mil by year-end from about RM160mil in 2009.

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

China Life 2009 profit up 72 per cent

Insurancenewsnet.com        April 08, 2010

BEIJING _ China Life Insurance Co. said Thursday its 2009 profit surged 72 per cent as China's economic rebound boosted stock markets and investment income.

Profit for the year ending Dec. 31 was 32.8 billion yuan (US$4.8 billion), or 1.16 yuan (17 cents) per share, the Beijing-based company said. It said revenues rose 13 per cent to 339.3 billion yuan ($49.7 billion).

``This was primarily due to an increase in investment yield resulting from favourable capital market conditions,'' the company said in a statement.

Assets rose 24.2 per cent over the previous year to 1.2 trillion yuan ($175 billion), the company said. That came as China's main stock market index rose 80 per cent amid a stimulus-fueled economic rebound from the global downturn.

S'pore expected to play key role in providing insurance against political risk

Channelnewsasia    By Ryan Huang, Jonathan Peeris         07 April 2010 2101 hrs

SINGAPORE: Singapore is expected to play a key role in providing insurance against political risk for cross border investments in the region.

This is according to the World Bank's Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) whose study shows that nearly four in 10 respondents investing into emerging markets are taking risk management more seriously.

Emanuel Salina, senior investment officer, World Bank's Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, said: "What we see is that the crisis has brought risk in general to the forefront.

"It has made risk more evident to investors. I think before the crisis, everybody got very comfortable with taking risks without actually measuring or understanding them adequately. And the crisis has shown that risks actually exist."

Trade promotion agency IE Singapore said Asia will need almost US$8 trillion in infrastructure investments over the next 10 years and it expects Singapore to be able to leverage on its strong insurance sector.

Angela Png, group director, International Organisations, IE Singapore, said: "In terms of getting more of the pie, it goes with the whole eco-system of Singapore being a financial hub.

"Because if more investors are coming into Singapore to invest or regionalise out of Singapore, then the insurance will be part of the whole financing solutions. So there is the opportunity, now ironically with the crisis and awareness of risk, for the insurers to sort of get in on the action."

Free insurance for lower-income families with young children

www.todayonline.com        by Ng Jing Yng         05:55 AM Apr 10, 2010

SINGAPORE - Lower-income families with young children will get free insurance cover under a scheme that has been set up just for them by NTUC Income.

This insurance scheme called the Income Family Micro-Insurance Scheme (IFMIS) will pay out $5,000 in the event that the main breadwinner of the family dies or becomes totally and permanently disabled. No waiting period is needed for the payout and the scheme also covers pre-existing illnesses.

About 18,000 children from some 13,000 families will benefit from this initiative, which was announced at the NTUC Income Summit Club Gala Dinner on Friday.

NTUC Income chief executive Tan Suee Chieh said the company is launching the scheme as part of its commitment to help the community and also to mark its 40th anniversary this year.

The IFMIS is expected to cost the company up to $500,000 over the next three years.

No application is required to join the scheme, as the insurance cover is automatically extended to active recipients under the ComCare GROW schemes.

The latter are administered by the five Community Development Councils (CDCs) and come under the purview of the Ministry of Community Development, Youth and Sports.

Guest-of-honour Dr Vivian Balakrisnan, Minister for Community Development, Youth and Sports (MCYS), applauded NTUC Income, saying "it has continued to demonstrate how a social enterprise can deliver good business results and at the same time, bring about positive social outcomes".

The scheme "is a fine example of NTUC Income innovatively translating its business results to benefits for needy and disadvantaged families", he added.

The current year will also see NTUC Income contributing close to $3 million towards charity, community projects and other NTUC-related projects.

Aviva re-enters Asia insurance

The Straits Times Singapore    By Gabriel Chen     Apr 9, 2010

European and US insurers are keen to expand their presence in Asia, seen as one of the world's fastest-growing financial services markets, thanks to rising household incomes on the back of strong economic growth.

AVIVA, the world's fifth largest insurance group, has re-entered the Asian general insurance market - five years after selling its non-life operations in the region.

Singapore will become its first regional market offering general insurance.

The company will sell car insurance here first directly to its customers online, before quickly increasing its portfolio of products to include home and travel insurance.

Mr Simon Machell, Aviva Asia Pacific chief executive, said at a briefing on Friday that Aviva will be the only insurer in Singapore to sell car insurance online.He believes this is the way to go as Singaporeans become more price sensitive and shop around for cheaper options.

'We know the cost of motoring continues to go up and we are launching this good deal to help consumers,' Mr Machell said.

Due to the cutting out of commissions and complex back office processes, its rates will be about seven per cent cheaper than its competitors on the average, he added.

Global takaful contributions to reach US$8.8b

www.theedgemalaysia.com    Written by Loong Tse Min Tuesday, 13 April 2010 22:45

KUALA LUMPUR: The global takaful industry is on track to surpass US$8.8 billion (RM28.42 billion) in contributions this year, said Ernst & Young (EY).

Saudi Arabia and Malaysia were the world's biggest takaful markets, it said in its World Takaful Report 2010 released at Fifth Annual World Takaful Conference in Dubai on Monday, April 12.

In a statement on Monday, EY said Saudi Arabia had contributions totalling US$2.9 billion in 2008 and Malaysia had US$900 million. Outside the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Southeast Asia, Sudan had the most significant market with contributions totalling US$280 million in 2008.

The fastest-growing takaful markets were the United Arab Emirates with a compounded annual growth rate (CAGR) of 135% from year 2005 to 2008 and Indonesia at 35%, it said. The global CAGR from 2005 to 2008 was 39%.

However, generating profitability may remain a challenge. Sameer Abdi, EY's head of Middle East Islamic Financial Services Group, said: "Globally, performance has been mixed. Yields realised by GCC operators have been comparably high but volatile, while Malaysian operators have posted stable returns driven by better underwriting results."

In terms of operating efficiency, average combined ratios of GCC firms had continued to improve and reached 72% in 2009 (latest year for which data is available), indicating improving operational efficiency, he added.

"The figures seem to indicate that while the industry may seem to be temporarily bogged down by market troughs, the long-term outlook seems very positive," he said.

EY said family and medical takaful continued to grow, with compulsory medical insurance requirements in Saudi Arabia contributing to such growth.

Southeast Asia is the most highly penetrated family and medical takaful market, accounting for 73% of net contributions in 2008, compared with 49% of gross contributions in the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) region.

The primary challenge for the industry remained the shortage of skilled professionals across all key areas such as underwriting, risk management, claims management and TECHNOLOGY [] deployment, said EY, adding that underwriting losses remained a concern for most operators.

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

不满保险代理说话前后不一 女老师向消协投诉

光华日报    二零一零年四月三日 晚上十一时二十一分

(马六甲3日讯)女老师购买一份综合性保单时,保险代理员说明包括医药卡、人寿、意外、36种疾病及住院津贴,一个月后事主因伤入院,却被告知本身购买的保险并不包括住院津贴,令她非常不满!

女事主吴沅镁(22岁)是于去年7月间向一名保险代理员购买保险,对方声称她购买的保险可享有住院津贴,1星期100令吉。一个月后,她因为被玻璃割伤缝18针,住院一星期,其保险代理员当时到医院探望她,答应为她争取2个星期,即200令吉住院津贴,复诊期也包括在内。可是,保险代理后来又反悔,指她购买的保单并不包括住院津贴。

由于不满保险代理说话前后不一,她毅然于去年9月断保,并在男友蔡伟龙陪同下,于今天向大马消费人协会联合会顾问蔡金地投诉。

吴小姐说,她曾经向其他保险代理员了解,被告知她购买的保险有包括住院津贴。

她说,该名代理在去年12月时把逾200令吉的赔偿交予她,但她因为没有包括住院津贴(200令吉)拒绝接受。不过,代理之后透过她的哥哥转交有关款项,后者在不明就理下接受了款项。

较后,蔡金地当场致电该保险公司查询,对方声称女事主的保单已于去年9月5日终止。他过后也联络该名保险代理员,后者表示如果事主要继续投保及索取住院津贴,必须缴清从去年9月至今的保费,以及缴付60令吉的医药报告费用即可。

Saturday, April 3, 2010

A wife's rights to hubby's assets

The Star Malaysia    Sunday April 4, 2010    By SHAHANAAZ HABIB

KUALA LUMPUR: Very few Muslim women know that they are entitled to claim harta sepen­carian which can amount to half of their husband's assets upon the latter's death.

It is common for women to stake a claim for harta sepencarian (joint assets accrued during the marriage) in divorce but not in death, said AmanahRaya Legacy Services CEO Rafie Omar.

"This is because Muslim widows do not know their rights and entitlement. They think that if they have children, they are entitled only to one-eighth of the husband's assets (under the faraid system) and if they have no children, they think they can get only a quarter of the husband's assets.

"But women in Malaysia contribute to the success of their husbands, so the women should claim and are entitled to a portion of the harta sepencarian if they can show they contributed," said Rafie in an interview.

He said this was on top of the faraid (Islamic inheritance law and distribution of estate) portion the wife would get.

Hence the difference between Case 1 and Case 2. In the first case, Zainab knew that as a wife, she could claim up to 50% of her spouse's assets under harta sepencarian. So she received RM500,000 from her share of harta sepencarian and another RM62,500 as her faraid share (which is one-eighth of the remaining RM500,000).

Kamariah, on the other hand, was not aware of harta sepencarian and made no claim for it. As a result she received only RM125,000 which is one-eighth of RM1mil.

(In both cases, the rest of the money and assets were divided among the children with the boys getting twice the share of their sisters).

Under the faraid system, a wife with children would get one-eighth of her husband's assets and she is entitled to a quarter of her husband's assets if they have no children.

"If I die leaving RM100,000 in assets and my widow can show that she contributed to the sum, she is entitled to half of it and will get RM 50,000 first. Then from the remaining RM50,000, she will get her one-quarter share (if the couple has no kids) or one-eighth (with kids)," he said.

Rafie said even if the woman was a housewife who stayed home and looked after the kids, she could still claim for harta sepencarian.

"She can say that having a good wife at home made his life comfortable and easy for him to earn a living. If she can prove this in court, depending on the judge and evidence given, she is likely to be apportioned 30% to 50% of the harta sepencarian," he added.

When such a claim is pending in court, Amanahraya (Malaysia's premier trustee company) would suspend the faraid distribution until the matter is settled"We will pay the harta sepencarian entitlement first. And then distribute the balance under the faraid," said Rafie.

Under the faraid system, if a wife has no children and no male relative, she gets a quarter of her husband's assets and the remaining three quarters go to Baitul Mal (the treasury under the states' Islamic councils), which is why it is important for her to claim the assets under harta sepencarian.

If the wife can prove to Baitul Mal that she was the one who paid for everything, it may even renounce its right to the assets.

On polygamous marriages, the wives should also know their rights to the harta sepencarian.

Citing an example, Rafie said that Mr A married Madam B for 20 years and acquired RM10,000 during their marriage. Then took a second wife, a Madam C, who is the daughter of a rich man. His business thrived because of her contacts and he subsequently acquired RM10mil. Later, he married Madam D and did not acquire much during his marriage with the third woman.

Would all his three wives be entitled to equal share after his death?

"If he leaves behind RM10mil upon death, it is not fair to his second wife if the wife's portion of one-eighth under faraid is to be divided equally among the three wives (with each getting a 1/24 share). Because it was during his second marriage that he made his money. "So, his second wife should claim under the harta sepencarian that it was during his marriage to her that he became richer. She has to prove that it was the second marriage that made him richer and not the first or third. If she does that, she can walk away with up to 50% of his assets," said Rafie.

Case 1: Zai­nab's husband Ismail dies and leaves behind assets comprising savings, EPF and a link house worth a total of about RM1mil. They have two boys and two girls. She receives RM562,500 as her share from the assets.

Case 2: Kamariah is married to Sabri who leaves behind assets worth about RM1mil when he dies. However, she is apportioned only RM125,000. She too has two boys and two girls.

Seeking a just and fair share for all

The Star Malaysia    Sunday April 4, 2010    By SHAHANAAZ HABIB

AISHAH had always dreamt of a good family life, with a great husband and four or five children running around.

As luck would have it, she met a wonderful man, Kamil, and after a year they got married.

Ten years later, they were still childless but happy.

Recently, tragedy struck. Kamil who was in his mid-30s died of a heart attack, sparking an unexpected crisis for Aishah.

The couple had always lived in Kamil's family home. He was an only child and had inherited the house from his mother when she died. Although Kamil's mother had fully paid for the house 30 years ago, Aishah is now in danger of losing it.

Under the faraid law of the Shafie school of thought (which is practised in Malaysia), a wife with no children and no male relatives on the husband's side inherits only 1/4 of her husband's home.

The remaining 3/4 goes to Baitul Mal, the treasury body within the state's Islamic religious council.

(The Hanafi and Hambali schools of thought, which are also from the Sunni tradition, differ from the Shafie (and Maliki) school in their faraid system where Baitul Mal does not stand to inherit. After the initial distribution, if there is any balance, under Hanafi and Hambali schools, it reverts back to the female heirs where there is no male.)

A very worried Aishah says she is still in shock.

"I don't know what to do. I was told that I can 'redeem' the house by paying Baitul Mal the 3/4 portion and at today's market value, I have to fork about RM200,000 (75% of the market value).

"Where am I going to get that kind of money from? My husband just died and I have to start worrying about my future and making ends meet.

"And now I don't even have my home. My mother-in-law paid for that house! And it was our home for 10 years and now they want to take it! Where am I going to go? I feel so insecure and vulnerable," says a desperate Aishah.

In another case, Faris was riding pillion on his uncle's motorbike when a lorry rammed into them, killing them both instantly.

Since his father had already passed away, Faris' mother is now the sole heir and she inherits 1/3 of Faris' assets while 2/3 goes to Baitul Mal.

But if it was Faris father – not his mother – who was alive and the only surviving relative, he would have inherited Faris' entire estate and nothing would have gone to Baitul Mal. Director-general of the Wakaf, Zakat and Haji department (Jawhar) at the Prime Minister's Department, Datuk Dr Sohaimi Mohd Salleh, says everyone, especially husbands, fathers and brothers, should not wait to have their wealth apportioned upon their death.

"They should hibah (give) now when they are alive. That way the girls can get more. The girls can even get everything. A person should be wise. He should understand Islam.

"If his kejahilan (ignorance) is the reason his money goes to someone else, why blame others," he said in an interview.

Under the Shafie faraid system, he points out that Baitul Mal inherits when the person has no heir; has an heir but the person is ineligible to receive the inheritance because he is a non-Muslim or for other reasons (such as he is the dead person's murderer or an apostate); has an heir but there is "excess or balance" in the distribution according to faraid. Defending the system, Dr Sohaimi stresses that it "does not totally discriminate women" and women can still go to Baitul Mal to seek help. After all, Baitul Mal uses the money for public welfare and to help the poor and other needy groups.

Why can't Malaysia then can't follow the Hambali and Hanafi faraid law (which are after all also Sunni) whereby if there is no male heir, the remaining portion reverts wholly to the woman heir – instead of Baitul Mal – as that would seem fairer to women?

"We are of the Shafie school of thought. So we have to follow the Shafie system. We can't ikut sedap kita (just take what we please)," says Dr Sohaimi.

However, an expert on Islam, Prof Dr Mohammad Hashim Kamali, raises a pertinent point.

"Did Islam consist of the Shafie, Hanafi, Hambali, Maliki schools of thought during the Prophet's time and of the leading caliphs and companions during the time of pristine Islam?" he asked.

Dr Hashim, chairman and CEO of the International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies (IAIS), points out that the mazhabs (schools of thought) only became predominant centuries later.

The Quranic laws of inheritance, he adds, is a fine construction and the problem is that if you interfere with one part, then other parts too are affected.

But he points out that the syariah's ultimate goal is for justice.

"This is the mega principle of Islam. The syariah is there to serve the cause of justice and not to apply rules for the sake of rules.

Dr Hashim points out there are "situations of inheritance" whereby in the absence of legal male heirs, the remaining wealth is reverted back to the female heir through a formula called RADD.

RADD is an accepted formula of the Islamic law of inheritance whereby a legal heir is entitled to a larger share by return of the leftover of assets after the initial instance of distribution.

For example, if a father dies leaving only a daughter as his sole heir, she will get half his assets through the faraid entitlement and the remaining half will revert to her under the principle of RADD, and Baitul Mal gets nothing.

"There are certain formulas that remedy situations when normal rules, when applied, will not deliver a fair outcome. Then you go to those exceptional formulas. You have to have those formulas at hand," says Dr Hashim.

He adds that while the various schools of Islamic jurisprudence differ in their degree of acceptance of the RADD, this could perhaps be applied with greater flexibility in the interest of fair dealing and ihsan (goodness).

Dr Hashim explains that female entitlement and men getting twice the share of the female in Islam is driven by a certain logic - where a man is held responsible for the maintenance and support of the women in his household whether she is married or unmarried.

Before marriage, she is the responsibility of her father or another male relative and after marriage, that responsibility goes to her husband.

"The male relative is obliged to support a woman and that is the rationale for the larger share. But now, you may have a situation where the woman is the only bread-winner and sometimes a woman even supports a male relative.

"We have text and scriptural injunctions of the Quran such as inheritance based on a certain logic but that logic has now changed. Are you open to changing the laws?

"Some would say 'no' you can't open the text to this kind of rationality while others would say 'yes' because we have had similar situations in the Quran where non-Muslim citizens in a Muslim state must pay the jizzya (poll tax) while Muslims pay the zakat.

"But we have moved away from that. Now everyone, regardless of religion pays income tax. The logic and rationale for that has changed so we don't apply the jizzya anymore," he said.

Islam was very open in its first 100 years, he says, where the Caliphs discussed and consulted and looked to the Quran and Hadis to find a relevant and fair solution to issues.

They applied isthisan (reasoning in the nature of jurisdictional preferences) in addressing situations when the results would go against the spirit of justice if normal rules of law were applied.

He suggests that isthisan could be used here to apply to cases of distribution and inheritance that seem unfair.

He says while judges here apply the Shafie school of law first, they are also allowed to look at the other three Sunni legal schools (Hanafi, Hambali, Maliki) "whenever they feel it would serve justice in a better way"; after all, one of the principles of Islam is ehsan, which is being good and fair to people.

Room for appeal

When it comes to reality, the Selangor Islamic Religious Council (MAIS) says it does have a heart.

Denying that Baitul Mal is unjust to women, deputy secretary Abdul Halem Hapiz Salihin says "we are only accepting what we are entitled to under the law."

"There have been instances where we have given the house to the women, especially if she is the only child. There have been also cases where we have reduced the amount the woman needs to pay to redeem the land or house. We do take this into consideration," he said.

AmanahRaya Legacy Service CEO Rafie Omar too says that it is a wrong perception to think that Baitul Mal is there to grab people's land or assets. He says women can appeal to Baitul Mal and they will listen.

"I know for a fact that in the Federal Territory, a wife can go to Baitul Mal and present her case and for deserving cases, Baitul Mal will renounce their right or share to the asset; not always but for deserving cases."

Heirs need not lose out

The Star Malaysia    Sunday April 4, 2010    By SHAHANAAZ HABIB

The Muslim inheritance is a complicated matter and many are uninformed of the numerous ways to effectively provide for their heirs, especially women.

HASSAN died leaving behind his wife, two daughters and two sons. But before he died, he drew up a will for his assets to be divided equally among the five.

His wishes differ from the faraid (Islamic law of inheritance and distribution) system.

Under faraid, his wife gets 1/8 of his assets, the two sons are entitled to twice the portion of their sisters which means each boy receives 7/24 of the assets while the sisters take 7/48 each.

(In Islam, it is the male member's responsibility to take care of the female members lik e his wife, daughters, mother, sisters and aunts, hence the male is entitled to two portions of the female's share.)

So would Hassan's last wishes be accepted or would the faraid system override it?

The final decision rests with the family members.

AmanahRaya Legacy Services' CEO Rafie Omar says Hassan's wishes will be carried out if all his heirs agree to it.

"Many Mu slims mistakenly think that the faraid comes first. But in Islam, faraid is in fact second to family settlement.

"Faraid is the law for distribution of estate upon death if the family can't reach a settlement themselves. If all the heirs agree that everything should go to the mother – despite the faraid portion they are entitled to – will that be a problem?

No, there won't be any problem.

A fair solution

"Faraid provides the solution if a family can't reach a settlement," he says.

So in the case of Hassan, if they all agree and say: "Yes, let's follow father's wishes and divide it equally", then it will be done, says Rafie.

One crucial point is that the agreement from the heirs must come after the person's death. It is not enough to have them agree – even in writing – before the person's death.

Because they can change their minds after their loved one is gone, the agreement made prior to the death becomes null and void.

However, from experience, Rafie finds when the heirs read the will, they normally agree with it and it i s carried out.

In the case of Hassan, if one of his sons opposes the equal distribution and fights for his two portion share, then the faraid system kicks in.

"The son who objects gets his two portions first, then the balance of the estate would be distributed equally among the remaining four," explains Rafie.

And from AmanahRaya's experience, he says, usually even if one family member disagrees with the will and insists on collecting his portion, the others would still go along with the will.

AmanahRaya Legacy Services Sdn Bhd (ARLS) is the wholly owned subsidiary of AmanahRaya Bhd, the country's premier trustee company; its services include will writing, trust accounts, legacy management and estate administration services.

It is the main player in the market for writing wills for Muslims. So far, ARLS has written 302,972 wills or wasiat for Muslims and 34,480 for non-Muslims.

The faraid inheritance list apportions the asset based on more than 100 combinations of heirs. For full list, refer to the AmanahRaya website www.arb.com.my Unlike a non-Muslim will, the Muslim wasiat is unique because a person is allowed to will only up to 1/3 of his assets – a nd generally that goes to non-heirs.

This is because the share for heirs is already provided for through the faraid system.

The 1/3 ruling came into existence during the Holy Prophet's time when one of his companions who was sick, wanted for all of his assets after his death to be given to charity and the Prophet said 'no'.

He then asked if he could donate half to charity and again the Prophet said 'no'; and when asked what about 1/3, the Holy Prophet said 'yes' adding, however, that "it is better to leave your heirs rich than poor and begging."

Despite the 1/3 rule, Rafie says a Muslim h ere can still will all his assets or more than 1/3 to a non-heir, including a charity. "But when he dies and the wasiat is to be implemented, if his next-of-kin objects, then the non-heir is entitled to 1/3 maximum.

However, if all the heirs agree that the whole estate goes to the non-heir as stated in the will, t hen it w ill be done," he says.

"With the Muslim wasiat, consent of the heirs is fundamental," explains Rafie. So can a person then name an heir for the 1/3 portion?

Again, Rafie says, this is subject to approval from all the other heirs. If an heir is named for the 1/3 portion, then he would in f act be getting extra as he is already entitled to a share under the faraid distribution.

But if everyone agrees to it, then it will be implemented.

Rafie says heirs too can do a 'takharuj' which is renouncing their right to their share of the assets. Citing a court case in the 1980s, he says a wealthy Muslim man in KL died, leaving a lot of assets and properties but since all his children were already doing well financially, none of them wanted a share of the assets.

"So they all agreed to 'takharuj' and give it all to the grandchildren. That's not faraid. But that's not a problem since al l the heirs agreed to it."

Unique features

There are other unique features in the Muslim wasiat.

The debts of the dead person must be settled first, however, before the assets can be distributed. After that, comes the 1/3 portion as stated in the will – that must be given out next. Only after that will the family get their share through either family settlement or faraid.

By comparison, in a non-Muslim will, a person can deliberately exclude an heir from inheritance by making that intention very clear in the will.

But with Muslim wills, such an exclusion is not possible.

An heir is an heir and regardless of w hat is stated in the wasiat he is entitled to a share of the inheritance under faraid – unless he himself takharuj (gives up the right).

The faraid system is not without its critics, particularly when it comes to women and Muslim converts. With regards to family settlement, it does not work when it comes to families with all female heirs (see Seeking a just and fair share for all).

Some argue that present day realities are different and rules should evolve to meet the times while others argue that faraid is God's law and is not be tampered with.

With regards to family settlement, it does not work when it comes to families with all female heirs.

Rafie suggests that Muslims use other instruments available to them such as hibah (gifts) and trust funds to distribute their assets whichever way they want and to whoever they want while they are still alive.

"Wasiat is not the solution," he adds. Citing an example, he says, if a father with three children wants to leave all his money and house to his second daughter because she is the one who takes care of him in his old age, he can do that.

What he should do is to give it to her now (intervivos) and transfer everything to her name while he is still alive so it cannot be challenged later on.

Otherwise, he notes, even if his other two children give their consent during the father's lifetime, once he is dead, they can withdraw their consent and make their

claim for it under the faraid. Similarly, Rafie advises Muslims to hibah (give) to those not entitled to a share under the faraid system such as a sister, an adopted brother or a non-Muslim family member if you would like them to get something from you.

"So give what you want now when you are still around," he says.

An unusual feature of the hibah is that when it is from a parent to his child or grandparent to his grandchild, it can be revoked. If the parent or grandparent asks for his gift or house back, for whatever reason, the child or grandchild has a Syariah obligation to return it.

But if it is a gift to other people, then it cannot be revoked.

Another instrument is a trust fund for their loved ones.

Rafie says parents should consider transferring a sum of money or assets in a trust for their offspring.

"So when I die, I leave no estate behind; so there's nothing others can claim. The trust fund for my child or children will not be frozen because it is theirs and not part of my estate."

The parent can manage and control the fund while he is alive and when he is dead, the appointed trustee would manage it according to what he has been instructed.

"Not many people know this but our trust funds give out a dividend of 4.5% annually. So if you put in RM100,000, you can enjoy a dividend of RM4,500 a year while you are still alive or you can plow it back to the fund so that it is compounded."

Another interesting alternative much practised in the past, says Rafie, is for a parent to transfer a piece of land from himself to himself as a trustee for a particular child or children.

"So when he dies, what is the status of the land? The land is not his estate. The land is the trust property for those children.

And they can then organise the estate so that the land is transferred to them.

"A lot of people have forgotten this.

Muslims can do this and non-Muslims can too," he says.

One other aspect not to be forgotten is, of course, insurance policies and the EPF savings.

For Muslims, the beneficiary does not take all the money. He plays the role as executor and is responsible for distributing it according to the faraid or family settlement.

Followers